Marxism and Crime - History Learning Site

Essay on Marxists Crime and Deviance.

He generalized this concern into a theory of conflict that attempted to explain why some acts are defined and prosecuted as criminal whereas others are not. In The Social Reality of Crimefor example, he concluded that public conceptions of crime are constructed in the political arena to serve political purposes.

Taking a neo-Marxist approach in Critique of Legal Orderhe introduced a theory of legal order intended to demystify the false consciousness that he maintained was created by official reality.

Later in his career Quinney examined the construction of moral and peaceful societies. Sutherland Award from the American Society of Criminology for contributions to theory and research. Richard Quinney. Article Media. These factors were based on physical build; they argue that stocky round individuals mesomorphs tend to be more active and aggressive than those with other builds. This may be true, but a criminal is more likely to possess these characteristics because a small weak man would undoubtedly make a very poor criminal.

Strength is something that is of benefit when you are to undertake the role of criminal, and thus opens the criminal arena to the mesomorph. Similarly, any bizarre appearance may well exclude the majority from leading a normal life.

Marxist view on crime and deviance essay

Taylor, Walton and Young also provided an alternative explanation for the link between the mesomorph and delinquency. They suggested: It may well be that the lower working-class children, who are more likely to be found in the criminal statistics, are also, by virtue of diet, continual manual labor, physical fitness and strength, more likely to be mesomorphic. It may well be that physiological factors predispose a person to criminal activities but to claim physiological factors, as the sole cause is an unfair notion as it causes society to observe certain people in a stereotypical view.

Thus certain members are virtually ostracized from society, which in turn in counter-productive as it segments society. Psychological theories share particular characteristics with physiological theories in how the deviant is seen. American revolution essay questions deviant is seen as entirely different from the population as a whole.

It is also evident that psychological theories look upon the deviant as abnormal in comparison with the rest of the population and that this irregularity creates an affinity to deviance. Psychological theories vary from physiological ones due to the fact that psychological theories are based on mental sickness rather than physical differences.

The British psychologist Hans Eysenck asserts that the characteristics of criminality and deviance can be found in the genealogy of the deviant. Thus individuals with the deviant genes, have the inclination to commit an act of deviance, he craves excitement, takes chances, often sticks his neck out, acts on the spur of the moment and is generally an impulsive individual. John Bowlby was not convinces with, the inherited gene theory, and proposed his own theory that a deviant personality develops due to the lack of maternal care.

Thus according to Bowlby theory a psychotic personality develops if there is not an intimate, loving relationship with the individual mother. One of the tendencies of psychopaths is to act without foreseeing or caring about the possible consequences. Therefore they can be considered chronic recidivists, a result brought forward from lack of maternal care. More than often delinquents, as described by Bowlby come from orphanages or broken homes where they are either deprived of the presence of a motherly figure or an intimate maternal relationship.

Sigmund Freud first developed the hypothesis of the id, ego and super-ego. The id being the primitive urges, such as the sex drive and the desire for nourishment. The ego is the conscious part of the mind which makes decisions, which restricts the id, as it foresees possible consequences. The super-ego exists due to socialization; thus all social values are imbedded in the sub-conscious.

Aichorn studied young delinquent boys, and concluded that they had suffered from under-developed egos, he connected this marxist view on crime and deviance essay fact, that most of the boys did not have a loving and intimate relationship with their mothers.

Thus social values which are resultant from socialization and motherly care were not imbedded in their sub-conscious.

Other sociologist attribute marxist essay on crime and deviance to an over-developed ego, Glover believed criminal behavior was a result of strict oppressive parenting, which results in a guilt ridden and neurotic child. Hewitt and Jenkins determined that individuals with an overdeveloped super-ego were reserved and restrained, thus it would be unlikely for them to be involved in crime.

Those with a under-developed super ego tended to be aggressive and are likely to be involved in crime, finally a third groups exist, were a application writing exists. But the individuals have not been completely assimilated into society, they have there own morals and values on which they base their actions, which are criminally inclined, and are usually part of a gang and their actions are deemed morally expectable.

Psychological theories offer realistic and unrealistic views and opinions of crime and deviance. As sociologists blame a myriad of psychological problems on crime, one must consider the fact that for example, many children whose mother has neglected them have not turned to a life of crime. Thus psychological theories are not one hundred-percent valid as there is not sufficient evidence to substantiate them.

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. This essay will evaluate the Marxist theory that the ruling class in society decides the law and enforces it, to reflect their own interests. Marxism is a political and social system based on the ideas of Karl Marx According to Marxists, society is controlled by the ruling capitalist class.

They believe that in a capitalist society, a small group of wealthy people the bourgeoisieown the means of production, such as; factories, businesses, land, etc and that they exploit the working class people the proletariatso that they can enjoy a huge profit and personal gain, either legally or illegally. Don't use plagiarized sources. Reflecting this Marxist theory, P.

So Marxists argue that working-class people are more likely to break the law because of exploitation and poverty. Crimes of the rich and powerful bourgeoisie can frequently go undetected because of the state and large businesses help each other.

Marxists therefore argue that capitalism is crimogenic - it is the single over-riding cause of all crime and deviancy in society due to poverty, unemployment and lack of opportunity. A poor underclass is formed who have to rely on crime to exist. However they also say the ruling classes themselves are deviant, by committing crimes that protect their power and wealth. Capitalist led governments turn a blind eye to this. He concluded that individuals in the police force, the business world and the local government, worked together to make money in gambling and prostitution, however, critics of Marxism would question how frequent this corruption was throughout the country and on its own, proves nothing without a lot more evidence.

Marxists always see working class criminal types as victims of the capitalist state. The prison system is also a source of cheap labour, believing that there is a connection between the use of workers in factories and in prisons.

Those who go along with capitalism have been persuaded from early childhood to conform to the capitalist mentality, due to consistent messages and brainwashing, especially from the media and education.

The police used violence, under orders from their superiors, who in turn had the tacit approval of their political masters. Individuals have a responsibility to take action for their own economic and social wellbeing. But in their way, they would also organise and manipulate the basic values and morality of a society. The legal system would be arranged to eliminate opposition, backed up by tough law enforcement, this time against capitalist deviants. In their theories, Marxists say that certain types of crime are more likely to be punished compared to others.

The older generation, who struggled to live from week to week, appreciated material assets, whereas the younger generation took them from granted, since they grew up with them. The social reaction to hippies was severe, but why was this the case? Neo Marxists see this associated with the concept of hegemony, not brainwashing, as Marxists would say, but making us give consent. Hippies threatened consumerism being judged on ones material possessions.

Therefore it had to be made sure that this never spread and therefore, the mass media depicted hippies badly. Hall looks at the phenomenon of the black mugger violence with the intention to rob. In august there became a moral panic of mugging- 60 events were reported as mugging in national daily newspapers. Betweenofficial statistic showed muggings to have risen each year about In order to cope with the recession and make the same profit as they used to, Britain to had to decrease wages and to worsen the working conditions.

At the time, there was a strong military situation that resisted. Gilroy looked at the myth of black criminality and saw that ultimately, black crime was an extension of colonial rule; that blacks lifestyle represented a threat to marxist view on crime and deviance essay therefore their criminalisation is a way to negate this threat.

Steve Box used the concept of hegemony and saw the law as a repressive agency of control.

Essay on Marxists Crime and Deviance. - Words - Cram

It can be seen that the new criminology can be credited in that it synthesises structure and action together. It focuses on moral panics and links this to the wider society.Thanks For sharing this information. Nice helpful post. Do you know your hidden name meaning? Click here to find your hidden name meaning.

Monday, 1 August Sociology of crime and deviance essay. This is a essay that i used for my Access to higher education diploma in social work course; it is also similar to the A level sociology course.

Marxists have an over simplistic view of crime. Although there are clearly some people with more power than others, this does not mean that they can pass any law that benefits them. Unlike the functionalist theories, the conflict theories focus on conflict between different sets of group values, rather than consensus in society.

Marx believes that the government and those in the upper class are the culprits of causing crime, and that they create laws and rules to continue to exploit the exploited. Hence, they often use crime as a means of controlling the working class, and this oppression makes crime inevitable.

Marxist View on Crime and Deviance 8 August Marxist sociologists such as Milton Mankoff, Frank Pearce and Laureen Snider see power as largely being held by those who own and control the means of production.

The superstructure reflects the relationship between the powerful and the relatively powerless: the ruling and subject classes. As part of the superstructure, the state, the agencies of social control, the law, and definitions of deviance in general, reflect and serve ruling-class interests.

Laws reflect marxism crime deviance essay interests of the bourgeoisie.

Traditional Marxist And Functionalist Perspectives On Crime Essay

They are passed by bourgeois parliament masked in a fake democratic process. The collective conscience marxist view on crime and deviance essay the will of society as a whole. Laws develop out of the collective conscience of a society - they are the norms of behaviour that are applied formally to everyone in marxist essay on crime and deviance.

A Functionalist would argue that an amount of crime is good whereas too much crime is bad and could bring about societal collapse bringing further anarchy and confusion. It was Emile Durkheim who began the study that gave birth to Functionalist approaches to crime. When a serious crime is committed and thus becomes public knowledge through media attention, Functionalists believe that there are bonds within society that are strengthened and a sense of horror is felt.

Emile Durkheim found that any society is founded, maintained and reproduced through consensus. When there is a shared, common consensus around key values then the social behaviour will be regulated. In society every individual performs a wide variety of roles such as employee, parent, and citizen.

Parsons considers that the roles played by the family and the education system are argumentative essay for vegetarian to social order and maintenance of the status quo.

Crimes motivated by financial gain, across the classes, can be seen as a logical outcome of the priorities of profit. Petty crimes can be seen as an expression of the frustration, aggression and hostility, which the system produces. This argument shows why people across the social spectrum commit crime. This is through how the ruling class ensure that their criminal actions are not defined that way whilst ensuring that working class behaviour is seen as criminal.

Exploiting workers by not giving them the wages they deserve for producing the goods, and therefore the profits of a company is not criminal, whilst stealing to provide for families which a minimum wage cannot do is.

Furthermore, the ruling class ensure that any laws that do define their actions as criminal do not carry harsh punishments. If a leading capitalist did end up in court, they can afford the best lawyers to ensure a lenient sentence or an acquittal as the Judiciary are from the same background as the ruling class so are therefore more likely to side with them.

This can be best illustrated by the immunity from prosecution that large companies in developing countries have, for example after the Bhopal disaster inwhich saw poor Indian workers and their families either killed or made seriously ill. Other branches of sociology have a different say on the law, and believe that the law represent the interests of others, not just the capitalist class. One way that the neo-Marxists slightly differ with the traditional Marxist theories is that it says there is more freedom of choice that people have when choosing to commit crime and people are not just puppets of the economy.

Here it could be said that the Neo-Marxists are taking interactionist theories on board and are moving away from the structuralist theories of traditional Marxism and Functionalism. Let Professionals Help You.

Help Me With Writing send me this sample Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours 23 : 59 : How about make it original? Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails. LIT W.

Marxism crime deviance essay

Admittedly, when examining theories of crime that would assume that societies are constantly changing, which creates a conflict among various groups. For instance, if all the groups had equally powerful and the same amount of resources, the battles would consist of comprise and negotiation, but groups tend to have different amount of power and resources they have….

Social Process theories just so happen to be my favorite type of theories throughout this entire course. It projects symbolic interactionism. Symbolic interactionism is the social behavior that occurs, which emphasizes the important role that language partakes in a community and children being social-able.

Critical theories are about how class and power generates….

Marxism crime deviance essay

  1. 0
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
« »



桃園市中壢區健行路56巷45號(近中壢火車站後站) / / 服務專線:03-4577945 /傳真:03-4573292 / 統編:28344553





Log In or Register

fb iconLog in with Facebook